Critical discuss empirical evidence supporting, or challenging, Essay

Critical discuss empirical evidence supporting, or challenging, Noelle-Neumann&apos s theory of ringlet of Silence - Essay ExampleIn addition, the people experiencing the circumstance of the theory often fear to drop their position in the society because of their divergent views (Donsbach, Salmon and Tsfati, 2013). Secondly, persons fear of adverse isolation or reprisal in a particular group. The individuals fear that their contribution to the group might hold out to a negative concern on the operations of the group.The theory further expounds that individuals have a quasi-statistical organ which enable them to what characters and contributions will lead to their isolation by the majority people in the group. According the theory, the closer an individual perceives the whim held agrees to the paramount opinion of the public, the more the likelihood of the person disclosing their opinion regarding the earnic (Mutz, 1998). In this case, people in a particular group tend to embra ce the opinion of the majority in the society regardless of their in-person opinions about the issue. Additionally, if the opinion of the public changes regarding a particular concept, the individual realizes that their opinion does not agree with the boilers suit opinion of the public. Consequently, they tend to minimize their contribution in various public forums in the society. The interpretations of the Theory of curl of Silence focus on various aspects of the society such as political, economic and religious contexts. pile in the various social contexts fail to contribute to the affairs of the society because of the effects of spiral of curb (Donsbach, Salmon and Tsfati, 2013).The spiral of silence starts with an in the initial contribution by the affected person top various issues in the society. According to the principles of the Spiral of Silence, an individual experiences the effects of the concept after their first opinion fails to concur with the overall opinion of t he public (Daschmann, 2000). On religious context, people fail to criticize