In Preventing a Brave New World (pp. 317-329), Leon Kass concludes Essay

In Preventing a Brave peeled World (pp. 317-329), Leon Kass concludes that reproductive and therapeutic cl one and only(a) of human embryos - Essay ExampleHe points out that repulsion (Kass, 2001) is non the undercoat of his argument as he points out that repugnance (Kass, 2001) of the past is silently authorized in the present. He moreover observes that disgust is non something that is emotional and hence he is not creation emotional when he criticizes the re-create of the human embryos but it is a deep thought into the matter makes him talk against the mechanism. He compares re-create with the incest relationships and other unethical activities like disfigurement of corpse or feeding on human flesh. Kass observes that as murder, rape or bestiality cannot be ethically reassert, in the same direction reproductive and therapeutic cloning of human embryos stands unjustified on the ground of ethics. Kass (2001), in his composition, says that cloning is resisted not only beca use it is strange to take up something like this but because he intuit that it is not bracing and cloning for him is the violation of things that he dearly holds. In the book he criticizes cloning on the reason of unethical experimentation, threatening the identity of human being and his or her individuality, transforming the essence of procreation into manufacturing. He besides argues against it on the ground of despotism that it heralds on the children, thereby becoming the harbinger of parenthood perversion. He makes reliable he is not misinterpreted when he is arguing against cloning. He points out that he is against the creation of reproductive cloning and not against the cloning that is used for the research work (Kass, 2001). On ethical grounds Kass argues that the cloning experiment has an unseemly and unethical effect on the child to be born. Its not that they would be only stirred adversely on the ethical grounds there can serious dangers to their life, as the experim ent of cloning has failed mostly among the animals. Incidents of fetal deaths and the deaths of the stillborn infants cannot be avoided in the process of cloning. He also points out that the so called proclaimed successes are actually failure. It has also been revealed very recently that there remains a postgraduate chance of disability and deformity among the cloned animals that lives after birth. He justifies his argument by citing examples of clone crows which has heart and lungs problems and cloned mice which develops ghoulish obesity later on in its life span. It has been also observed that a cloned animal fails in attaining normal development milestones. Though he argues on the ethical grounds of relationships and the associated problem that would arise from cloning he actually argues on a strong scientific and logical terms. His argument against cloning stands justified on the basis of the facts and figures that pay back been provided by him (Kass, 2001). He also puts forw ard an argument on the basis of identity and individuality crisis. It will be like a dilemma for the person who has been cloned, as not only will he have concerns about his distinguishing characteristics but also that he will have an identical appearance as his father or mother. This would lead to serious identity crisis. He indicates the adverse effect that a homey case can have if engaged in infra familial cloning. Cloning of the husband and the wife gives birth to a twin parent child relation. Eventually no parent will be competent to take care of the clone of himself or herself as one treats his or her own child. This creates a series of perplexity in the relationship, the way they are perceived. Like if the miss is the clone of